And I have PROOF of that, you wouldn't be here if you had not agreed. There is no response required as again, I AGREED (as did you) to allow them to change what they wish in their game, again, NOT a difficult concept to understand. Just because YOU don't agree with it doesn't mean you aren't BOUND by it, and ALL of the crying isn't going to change that. Yes, two years is an agreeable amount of time for a change, the EULA says it is and I agreed to be bound by the terms of the EULA, it's not a difficult concept to understand. I don't think refunding is going to be enough to justify the change. They said that they would avoid nerfing it, I expect them to follow it, regardless of how good the ship is.Īnd that line wasn't directed toward you, it was directed towards R_Razor. I expect them to have strong moral principles and be honest about what they are going to do with the ships. Integrity (noun)-the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles moral uprightness. I'm just using that and kami as an example for emphasis. I've stated, she's OP and she needs a nerf. No I wouldn't have cared if they nerfed her. He** they can gave her the most sh*ttiest stats of any BB and I wouldn't care (or do I need proof for this too?) I don't like the way WG is treating its customers. And don't forget, I really don't care about whether the ship gets nerfed or not. (Oh wait I would need proof for that I forgot lol). You still haven't responded/gave an adequate response as to why they decided to wait 2 years to change the ship, and not when it was first tested. So by your words, a space of two years is an agreeable amount of time for a change? I definitely don't. Basing arguments off of the term crybaby and the asking of proof.
0 kommentar(er)
